The so-called 9/11 Truth Movement, which
has been covered extensively by C-SPAN as well as Al-Jazeera,
has confused many Americans and Muslims alike about the nature
of the 9/11 attacks. This movement, which includes associates
of Lyndon LaRouche, who openly supported Saddam Hussein before
the first Gulf war, are telling us that the Bush
Administration was really behind the 9/11 attacks and blamed
them on the Arabs so it could go to war in the Middle East.
Incredibly, polls shows that about
one-third of the American people-and majorities of Muslims in
many Arab countries-actually believe this disinformation. In
reality, of course, as extensively documented by Al-Jazeera
itself, Osama bin Laden's
international al-Qaeda terrorist network planned and
carried out the suicide hijackings (Inside
9/11 - National Geographic). This information can be
considered reliable because Al-Jazeera has been consistently
shown to be an outlet for al-Qaeda propaganda with sources
inside the terror network. Indeed, its Kabul, Afghanistan,
reporter is now in prison because he was convicted of being an
agent of al Qaeda linked to the 9/11 plot.
While the Bush Administration can be
criticized for ignoring warnings that an attack like 9/11
might occur, it is the Clinton Administration which can be
accused of actually facilitating 9/11 by conducting a foreign
policy that promoted the rise of radical Islam.
We have looked at some of this evidence
before, shortly after 9/11, but we must take another look
because developments over the years have added to the case
against the Clinton Administration.
First, the Clinton Administration was
allied with radical Islam when it waged a war on Serbia and
the CIA was ordered to assist the Kosovo Liberation Army, some
of whose members were trained by bin Laden. That was 1999-two
years before 9/11.
One of many stories about such
connections appeared in the Washington Times on May 4, 1999,
and was written by Jerry Seper. It said, "Some members of
the Kosovo Liberation Army, which has financed its war effort
through the sale of heroin, were trained in terrorist camps
run by international fugitive Osama bin Laden...the KLA
members, embraced by the Clinton administration in
NATO's...bombing campaign to bring Yugoslav President Slobodan
Milosevic to the bargaining table, were trained in secret
camps in Afghanistan, Bosnia-Herzegovina and elsewhere,
according to newly obtained intelligence reports...The reports
said bin Laden's organization, known as al-Qaeda, has both
trained and financially supported the KLA. Many border
crossings into Kosovo by 'foreign fighters' also have been
documented and include veterans of the militant group Islamic
Jihad from Bosnia, Chechnya and Afghanistan."
After 9/11, Dollars for Terror,
an important book by Swiss television journalist Richard
Labeviere, explained in detail what was happening and how it
had backfired on the U.S. He presented the thesis that the
international Islamic networks linked to bin Laden were
nurtured by elements of the U.S. intelligence community,
especially during the Clinton years.
This is a shocking view, but it puts
other developments in perspective, such as Clinton support for
radical Muslims in such places as Kosovo and Bosnia before
that. The book also suggests that Islamic radicals, who were
present in the U.S. in the 1990s and training to fly aircraft,
were tolerated because it was believed that they were going to
hit targets in other countries, not the United States.
In other words, the CIA was actively
assisting the bin Laden network, thinking it would serve U.S.
interests.
This background is necessary to consider
the revelations about Able Danger, the secret military
intelligence network that had apparent knowledge of the 9/11
hijackers being active in the U.S. Despite congressional
hearings on this matter, much is still not known about Able
Danger and who knew what about the presence of the 9/11
hijackers on American soil. But we do know that Rep. Curt
Weldon, who has done the most in Congress to get to the bottom
of this intriguing story, is being targeted for defeat by a
number of former Clinton Administration officials and former
CIA official Mary McCarthy. They have all contributed to his
opponent Joseph Sestak. Do they have something to hide?
In this context, it is noteworthy that
the CIA issued a January 2000 report that essentially
whitewashed the nature of the KLA and claimed it was
pro-American. The only public release of this dubious
report came through Rep. Elliot Engel, in a posting
on the website of the National Albanian American Council,
which supports an Albanian Muslim takeover of the Serbian
province of Kosovo.
That report is an example of how the CIA
was corrupted during the Clinton years. That corruption, of
course, was carried forward into the Bush Administration when
a faction of the CIA sent Joe Wilson to Niger, supposedly to
investigate the Iraq-uranium link, and prompted a Justice
Department investigation of the press when it came out in
Robert Novak's column that Wilson's CIA wife had been behind
the trip.
The CIA, as AIM has documented, also
played a curious role in the aftermath of the crash of TWA
800, concocting a cartoon for the Clinton Administration
designed to discredit the eyewitnesses who saw a missile hit
the plane. An explosion in the fuel tank was blamed for the
crash, despite the eyewitness evidence.
But 9/11 was not the first time that the
policy had backfired on the U.S. It was during the Clinton
Administration that the Iranian-directed bombing of Khobar
Towers occurred, and, according to former FBI director Louis
Freeh, the Clinton national security apparatus worked long and
hard to prevent the truth from coming out. Freeh wrote,
"It soon became clear that Mr. Clinton and his national
security adviser, Sandy Berger, had no interest in confronting
the fact that Iran had blown up the towers." Berger, of
course, would later plead guilty to stealing national security
information from the National Archives on what the Clinton
Administration did-or did not do-to prevent 9/11. Berger was
desperate to cover something up.
We also know that, as part of his
pro-Muslim campaign in the former Yugoslavia, Clinton pursued
a controversial policy of enlisting Iranian help. A Senate
Republican report
confirms that the evidence shows that the Clinton
Administration approved the shipment of Iranian arms to
Bosnian Muslims.
But this isn't all. Questions about a
Middle Eastern connection to the bombing of the federal
building in Oklahoma City have never been put to rest.
Clinton, however, preferred to blame domestic right-wingers,
egged on by "hate radio." The media went along with
his propaganda ploy.
Was 9/11, like Oklahoma City and Khobar
Towers, the result of a policy of cultivating Muslim
extremists that backfired in a deadly way?
The Bush Administration was caught
off-guard by the events of 9/11, but President Bush had only
himself to blame, having kept on Clinton's CIA director,
George Tenet, whose fingerprints were all over the failed
policy.
Tragically, some of the misguided
Clinton policies have been continued, such as the plan to
create a Muslim state in Kosovo, to go along with the Muslim
state already established with Iranian help in Bosnia. Bush
should reverse course on that one-and fast.
Best Bites & Buys
publishes the opinions/ points of view of leading authorities in
multiple fields. The use of these opinions/points of view is
in no way a substitute for legal,
accounting, investment, medical or any professional
services to suit your specific personal needs. Please,
always consult
a competent/qualified professional for answers to your specific
needs/questions.
|